Should resentment or antipathy arise between husband and wife, he is not to divorce her but to bide in patience throughout the course of one whole yearDivorce is strongly condemned in the
Bahá’í Teachings. If, however, antipathy or resentment develop between the marriage partners, divorce is permissible after the lapse of one full year. During this year of patience, the husband is obliged to provide for the financial support of his wife
and children,
and the couple is urged to strive to reconcile their differences. Shoghi Effendi affirms that both the husband
and wife "have equal right to ask for divorce" whenever either partner "feels it absolutely essential to do so".
In Questions
and Answers, Bahá’u’lláh elaborates a number of issues concerning the year of patience, its observance (Q&A
12), establishing the date of its beginning (Q&A
19 and 40), the conditions for reconciliation (Q&A
38),
and the role of witnesses
and the Local House of Justice (Q&A
73 and 98). In relation to the witnesses, the Universal House of Justice has clarified that in these days the
duties of the witnesses in cases of divorce are performed by the Spiritual Assemblies.
The detailed provisions of the
Bahá’í laws on divorce are summarized in the
Synopsis and Codification, section IV.C.2.a.-i.
It is unlawful to beg, and it is forbidden to give to him who beggeth.In a Tablet ‘Abdu’l-Bahá expounds the meaning of this verse. He states that
“mendicancy is forbidden and that giving charity to people who take up begging as their profession is also prohibited”. He further points out in that same Tablet:
“The object is to uproot mendicancy altogether. However, if a person is incapable of earning a living, is stricken by dire poverty or becometh helpless, then it is incumbent on the wealthy or the Deputies to provide him with a monthly allowance for his subsistence . . . By 'Deputies' is meant the representatives of the people, that is to say the members of the House of Justice.”
The prohibition against giving charity to people who beg does not preclude individuals
and Spiritual Assemblies from extending financial assistance to the poor
and needy or from providing them with opportunities to acquire such skills as would enable them to earn a livelihood (see note
56).